Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

This document details Datarock’s product Geotechnical Strength Index (GSI) Proxy.

The literature, "Quantification of the Geological Strength Index Chart," introduces a structured approach to quantifying the Geological Strength Index (GSI), transforming the traditional qualitative assessment into a more standardised quantitative evaluationGeological Strength Index (GSI) was introduced in the early 1990s as a means to quantify and characterise the strength and deformability of rock masses for engineering and geotechnical applications. It was identified there was a need for a standardised index that could reliably assess the rock mass behaviour and provide valuable insights for construction and excavation projects. GSI takes into account various geological parameters such as rock structure, weathering, and joint conditions, assigning a numerical value to represent the overall strength and deformability of the rock mass.

Datarock has developed this product to extract as much information as possible from the core image, however it is named GSI Proxy for two key reasons:

  • Recognition of the fact that it is pushing the limits of what is achievable from a core photograph; and

  • It is not possible to reliably determine joint infill rating from a core photo.

Contents

Table of Contents
maxLevel6
minLevel1
include
outlinefalse
indent
excludeContents
typelist
printablefalse
class

...

The Roughness Rating is determined using Datarock’s Joint Roughness Coefficient as its basis (see JRC product description for details).

...

The JRC values are converted to a 0-6 scale using the following polynomial function (established by fitting a polyline to empirical data):

Eazy math inline
bodyRr = 4.051218e - 06\cdot x^3 - 1.215365e - 04\cdot x^2 + 4.508102e - 01 \cdot x- 1.191616e - 15

...

GSI Calculation from the Quantified Chart

The GSI value is determined by digitising the GSI plot on the surfer and obtaining the surface equation (a quadratic-second order surface). With the calculated x (SCR) and y (SR) coordinates on the GSI chart, these values are plugged into the surface equation to yield the GSI value, providing a quantified measure of the rock mass quality.

...

This method provides a systematic approach to quantifying the GSI by integrating various rock mass characteristics, as detailed in the paper. The use of empirical relationships and polynomial functions allows for a more objective and quantifiable assessment of the GSI, contributing to a standardised evaluation of rock mass conditions.

...

File Header

Description

hole_id

Customer’s Hole ID

depth_m

Depth of fracture (metres)

depth_fromFrom depth for the fracture detection bounding box_m

Start of interval (metres)

depth_to_m

End of interval (metres)

depth_from_ft*

Start of interval (feet)

depth_toTo depth for the fracture detection bounding box_ft*

End of interval (feet)

wjd

Weighted joint density

wjd_measurable

Weighted joint density using only “measurable” fractures

rqd_wjd

RQD - Weighted Joint Density measures rock solidity by assessing fracture frequency and size.

rqd_wjd_measurable

Assessment of rock quality by quantifying fracture impact on rock mass integrity.

weathering_score

Weathering Score evaluates the degree of rock degradation due to environmental exposure.

SRC_JRC

SRC_JRC is a measure that evaluates the shear strength and roughness of rock joints for stability analysis

SR

Structural Rating

SRC

Surface Roughness Coefficient

gsi

Geotechnical Strength Index

*Only included if project depths are in feet.

Product Limitations

Limitations

Comments

Lack of Infill Data

The absence of infill rating in the Surface Condition Rating (SCR) calculation means that the model may not fully capture the influence of infill materials on the mechanical behavior of discontinuities, despite the scaling adjustment.

Dependence on Visual Inspection 

GSI is traditionally estimated through visual inspection. The subjective nature of visual assessment can lead to variability in GSI values assigned by different assessors, potentially affecting the consistency and reliability of results.

...

Version

Date

Author

Rationale

1

22 Jan 2024

L Yanez

Initial release

2

29 Jan 2024

S Johnson

Updated to include depth in feet